在java中，不能通过直接通过T[] tarr=new T[10]的方式来创建数组，最简单的方式便是通过Array.newInstance(Class<t>type,int size)的方式来创建数组例如下面的程序。
public class ArrayMaker<T> {
private Class<T> type;
public ArrayMaker(Class<T> type) {
this.type = type;
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
T[] createArray(int size) {
return (T[]) Array.newInstance(type, size);
}
List<T> createList() {
return new ArrayList<T>();
}
/**
* @param args
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
/*
* Even though kind is stored as Class<T> , erasure means that it is actually just being stored as a Class, with
* no parameter. So, when you do some thing with it, as in creating an array, Array.newInstance( ) doesn’t
* actually have the type information that’s implied in kind; so it cannot produce the specific result, wh ich
* must therefore be cast, which produces a warning that you cannot satisfy.
*/
ArrayMaker<Type> am2 = new ArrayMaker<Type>(Type.class);
System.out.println(Arrays.asList(am2.createArray(10)));
System.out.println(Arrays.asList(am2.createList()));
}
}
class Type {
@Override
public String toString() {
return "type";
}
}
上面的这个例子比较简单，但是如果你有接触过泛型数组，你便对他的复杂度有一定的了解，由于创建泛型数组比较复杂，所以在实际的应用过程中一般会选择List的对泛型进行存储，如果实在需要使用泛型数组，则需要注意数组的在运行时的类型，think in java这本书中，对泛型数组的处理通过四个小程序对其进行了比较完整的描述。
程序一：这个程序主要说明了，在使用泛型数组中容易出现的问题，由于书中对于程序的说明比较详细，所以只对程序做引用。
class Generic<T> {
}
public class ArrayofGeneric {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Generic<Integer>[] genArr;
/*
* will throw ClassCastException :The problem is that arrays keep track of their actual type, and that type is
* established at the point of creation of the array. So even though genArr has been cast to a Generic < Integer
* >[] , that information only exists at compile time (and without the @SuppressWarnings annotation, you’d get a
* warning for that cast). At run time, it’s still an array of Object, and that causes problems.
*/
// genArr = (Generic<Integer>[]) new Object[] {};
/* can not create a generic of array */
// genArr=new Generic<Integer>[2];
genArr = (Generic<Integer>[]) new Generic[2];
System.out.println(genArr);
}
}
程序二：这个程序主要是说明在程序的执行过程中，泛型数组的类型信息会被擦除，且在运行的过程中数组的类型有且仅有Object[]，如果我们强制转换成T[]类型的话，虽然在编译的时候不会有异常产生，但是运行时会有ClassCastException抛出。
/**
*
* Because of erasure, the runtime type of the array can only be Object[]. If we immediately cast it to T[], then at
* compile time the actual type of the array is lost, and the compiler may miss out on some potential error checks.
*
*
*
* archive $ProjectName: $
*
* @author Admin
*
* @version $Revision: $ $Name: $
*/
public class ArrayOfGeneric2<T> {
public T[] ts;
public ArrayOfGeneric2(int size) {
ts = (T[]) new Object[size];
}
public T get(int index) {
return ts[index];
}
public T[] rep() {
return ts;
}
public void set(int index, T t) {
ts[index] = t;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
ArrayOfGeneric2<String> aog2 = new ArrayOfGeneric2<String>(10);
Object[] objs = aog2.rep();
System.out.println(objs);
/* will throw ClassCastException */
// String[] strs = aog2.rep();
// System.out.println(strs);
}
}
程序三：主要说明在对象中通过用Object[]来保存数据，则生成对象是，可以对其持有的对象在T和object之间进行转换，但是当设计到数组的转换时，还是会报ClassCastException
/**
*
* Initially, this doesn’t look very different compare with ArrayOfGeneric2.java , just that the cast has been moved.
* Without the ©SuppressWarnings annotations, you will still get "unchecked" warnings. However, the internal
* representation is now Object[] rather than T[]. When get( ) is called, it casts the object to T, which is in fact the
* correct type, so that is safe. However, if you call rep( ) , it again attempts to cast the Object[] to a T[], which
* is still incorrect, and produces a warning at compile time and an exception at run time. Thus there’s no way to
* subvert the type of the underlying array, which can only be Object[]. The advantage of treating array internally as
* Object[] instead of T[] is that it’s less likely that you’ll forget the runtime type of the array and accidentally
* introduce a bug (although the majority, and perhaps all, of such bugs would be rapidly detected at run time)
*
*
*
* archive $ProjectName: $
*
* @author Admin
*
* @version $Revision: $ $Name: $
*/
public class ArrayOfGeneric3<T> {
Object[] ts;
public ArrayOfGeneric3(int size) {
ts = new Object[size];
}
public T get(int index) {
return (T) ts[index];
}
public T[] rep() {
return (T[]) ts;
}
public void set(int index, T t) {
ts[index] = t;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
ArrayOfGeneric3<Integer> aog2 = new ArrayOfGeneric3<Integer>(10);
Object[] objs = aog2.rep();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
aog2.set(i, i);
System.out.println(aog2.get(i));
}
Integer[] strs = aog2.rep();
System.out.println(strs);
}
}
程序四：是对泛型数组相对而言比较完美的解决方案
/**
*
* The type token Class<T> is passed into the constructor in order to recover from the erasure, so that we can create
* the actual type of array that we need, although the warning from the cast must be suppressed with @SuppressWarnings.
* Once we do get the actual type, we can return it and get the desired results, as you see in main( ). The runtime type
* of the array is the exact type T[].
*
* @author Admin
*
* @version $Revision: $ $Name: $
*/
public class ArrayOfGeneric4<T> {
T[] ts;
public ArrayOfGeneric4(Class<T> type, int size) {
/* to solution array of generic key code! */
ts = (T[]) Array.newInstance(type, size);
}
public T get(int index) {
return ts[index];
}
public T[] rep() {
return ts;
}
public void set(int index, T t) {
ts[index] = t;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
ArrayOfGeneric4<Integer> aog2 = new ArrayOfGeneric4<Integer>(Integer.class, 10);
Object[] objs = aog2.rep();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
aog2.set(i, i);
System.out.println(aog2.get(i));
}
try {
Integer[] strs = aog2.rep();
System.out.println("user Array.newInstance to create generci of array was successful!!!!! ");
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
转载请注明原文地址: https://ju.6miu.com/read-676223.html
